JAZZBAAT 24 ENGLISH
September 21, 2026 · 12:02 PM
Breaking
National

Rashid Alvi Targets BJP Over UCC Push

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Rashid Alvi has criticised the BJP over its continued push for the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), alleging that the move is aimed particularly at the Muslim community and describing it as an...

Rashid Alvi Targets BJP Over UCC Push

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Rashid Alvi has criticised the BJP over its continued push for the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), alleging that the move is aimed particularly at the Muslim community and describing it as an “act of obstinacy”.

Alvi's remarks came amid renewed political debate over the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code in India. The UCC has remained a contentious issue, with the BJP advocating for a common set of personal laws for citizens irrespective of religion, while opposition parties and several Muslim organisations have raised concerns over its potential impact on religious and cultural practices.

Taking aim at the BJP, Alvi questioned the need to pursue the issue when personal laws relating to different communities have historically developed within India's diverse social and religious framework. He alleged that the government's approach could create further divisions rather than addressing the country's broader concerns.

The Congress leader's comments have added to the political exchanges surrounding the UCC, which has emerged as one of the major issues in the BJP's legislative and political agenda. The party has consistently argued that a common civil code would promote equality before the law and eliminate differences based on religion in matters governed by personal laws.

The UCC broadly refers to a common legal framework governing personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance and adoption for citizens across religious communities. At present, several of these matters are governed by different personal laws applicable to different religious groups.

Supporters of the UCC argue that having different personal laws can create unequal legal treatment and that a common framework would strengthen gender justice and constitutional equality. Critics, however, contend that a uniform law could fail to adequately recognise India's religious and cultural diversity and could disproportionately affect minority communities.

The issue has become particularly politically sensitive because of its connection with questions of religious freedom and minority rights. Political parties have often differed sharply over whether a common civil code would strengthen national unity or create tensions among communities.

Alvi's criticism reflects the Congress party's broader opposition to what it sees as attempts to introduce policies that could affect minority communities without adequate consultation. The BJP, on the other hand, has maintained that the UCC is linked to the constitutional principle of equality and should not be viewed through a religious lens.

The debate is also taking place against the backdrop of growing discussions around the role of personal laws in a modern democratic society. Advocates of reform have called for greater emphasis on individual rights and gender equality, while opponents have stressed the importance of protecting cultural and religious practices.

The latest exchange between Alvi and the BJP is therefore likely to add another layer to the ongoing political debate. While the BJP continues to present the UCC as a measure aimed at legal uniformity and equality, opposition leaders such as Alvi argue that its implementation must take into account India's pluralistic character and the concerns of minority communities.

With the issue continuing to generate strong political reactions, the question of how India should balance uniformity in civil law with its constitutional commitment to religious and cultural diversity remains at the centre of the debate.

Discussion

Reader Comments 0

Write a comment
Start the conversation

No approved comments yet. Share a thoughtful response below.

Join the discussion

Your email will not be published. Comments appear after editorial approval.